Monday, January 16, 2017

Breaking News
   At Least 32 Dead As Cargo Plane Crashes Into Homes In Kyrgyzstan   UP Elections 2017: Grand Alliance II? Akhilesh Yadav, Rahul Gandhi Wait For \'Cycle\' Verdict   Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Teased as Flipkart Exclusive, Launch Set for January 19   Cyber Crime unit awaits nod to file chargesheet in 2014 case   No service tax on online rail tickets till Dec 31   Black money: India to gain access to Swiss bank info from Sept 2019   Cash curbs paralyse ops in co-op societies   Margao business, markets reel under liquidity crunch   Customers, bankers kept on toes in Mapusa   Long queues at banks on Day 1; cash crunch hits State   Anger And Scramble To Stash Cash In Black Money Squeeze: Foreign Media   After PM Modi Speech, Hawala (Money-Laundering) Spiked, Triggering Raids   Defence Minister Parrikar\'s Nuclear Remark Stressed As \'Personal Opinion   \'If You Succeed, The Country Succeeds\': Obama Tells Trump During Meet

Sections

Editorial

Identity politics

05th January 2017, 05:30 Hrs

Take away religion, caste, race, community and language and what is left of the individual? Practically nothing. Yet, that is what the Supreme Court wants candidates to do. In a four-three split judgement, the court prohibited candidates from appealing on the basis of the above mentioned identity markers. While the intention behind the majority judgement is laudable, there are inherent difficulties in implementing it. For instance will a candidate be allowed to discuss the injustices suffered by a particular caste? In regional politics, political parties like Naga People’s Front, Mizo National Front or the DMK are closely identified with race and region. Political parties representing caste, religion and language have played pivotal roles in giving voices to the oppressed and forgotten. Political agitations led by the Jats in Haryana or the Patels in Gujarat are based on caste and the governments have engaged such leaders in the spirit of inclusion. The solutions might not be encouraging, but identity politics cannot be wished away by a legal ruling. Take away language and the basis for statehood will suffer a severe blow. While use of all these or even one of the identity markers to generate hate or provoke violence cannot be tolerated, stretching the argument to a point where the individual and community loses its identity could prove to be counterproductive. 
comments powered by Disqus