Friday, July 21, 2017

Breaking News
   Goa will take a hit from 8 K\'taka projects: witness   11 politicos booked in last five years for different offences   2 ministers, 2 figures: What exactly is Zuari bridge cost?   State earned Rs`121 crore from entry tax   Govt relents, amends circular to exclude MLAs and MPs   Cabinet approves amendments to agricultural tenancy act   HC drops anchor on more casinos in River Mandovi   Fomento IT engineer dies in mishap   CM directs DoP to scrutinise plaint against Lobo, Parra p\'yat secy for forgery   Will efforts to expose LPG pilferage go in vain?   No service tax on online rail tickets till Dec 31   Defence Minister Parrikar\'s Nuclear Remark Stressed As \'Personal Opinion   After PM Modi Speech, Hawala (Money-Laundering) Spiked, Triggering Raids   Anger And Scramble To Stash Cash In Black Money Squeeze: Foreign Media   Long queues at banks on Day 1; cash crunch hits State   Customers, bankers kept on toes in Mapusa   Margao business, markets reel under liquidity crunch   Cash curbs paralyse ops in co-op societies   Black money: India to gain access to Swiss bank info from Sept 2019   \'If You Succeed, The Country Succeeds\': Obama Tells Trump During Meet

Sections

Business

Can't give info if FM, CEA consulted before demonetisation: RBI

02nd January 2017, 12:00 Hrs

Pic Credit: NOTES-RBI

Can\'t give info if FM, CEA consulted before demonetisation: RBI

PTI

New Delhi

Whether views of the Chief Economic Advisor and the Finance Minister were taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not comes under the definition of information under the transparency law.

The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.

“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.

Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former Chief Information Commissioner A N Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.” “How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been that should views be taken then it would mean taking opinion,” former Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of RBI Central Public Information Officer.

The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.

The query was also sent to the Prime Minister\'s Office and the Finance Ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.

The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before scraping of old Rs 500 and Rs 1000 currency notes.

“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.

The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes worth Rs 20 lakh crore was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.

It also cited Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act to deny minutes of deliberations related to demonetisation.

Blurb: The query was sent to the Prime Minister\'s Office and the Finance Ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application

comments powered by Disqus